Week 19 - Create Task Grading Hacks 3

• Performance Task #1
• Performance Task #2
• Performance Task #3
• Performance Task #4
• Reflection:

	Home	About Me	Time Box	Funny picture of a bird	Java Testing	Java Table	API

Performance Task #1

Row #	Score	Explanation	Comments
1	1/1	Video shows: input output functionality Written response includes: describes the overall purpose of the program. describes what functionality of the program is demonstrated in the video. describes the input and output of the program demonstrated in the video.	Criteria met, nothing to say
2	0/1	written response includes two program code segments: one that shows how data has been stored in this list (or other collection type). one that shows the data in this same list being used as part of fulfilling the program’s purpose. written response also includes: identifies the name of the variable representing the list being used in this response. describes what the data contained in this list is representing in the program.	Criteria met except for showing data being used
3	0/1	written response includes: includes a program code segment that shows a list being used to manage complexity in the program. explains how the named, selected list manages complexity in the program code by explaining why the program code could not be written, or how it would be written differently, without using this list.	Does not need a list for first part. Second part is actually also not met because while it is explained how to write otherwise, it does not manage complexity.
4	1/1	written response includes two program code segments: one showing a student-developed procedure with at least one parameter that has an effect on the functionality of the procedure. one showing where the student-developed procedure is being called. written response also includes: describes what the identified procedure does and how it contributes to the overall functionality of the program.	Actually not met because it does not explain the procedure's contribution to the overall project
5	1/1	written response includes an algorithm with: sequencing iteration selection written response also includes: explains in detailed steps how the identified algorithm works in enough detail that someone else could recreate it.	criteria are met
6	1/1	written response includes describes two calls to the selected procedure identified in written response 3c. Each call must pass a different argument(s) that causes a different segment of code in the algorithm to execute. describes the condition(s) being tested by each call to the procedure. identifies the result of each call.	criteria are met
Overall: 4/6
Actual: 3/6

Performance Task #2

Row #	Score	Explanation	Comments
1	1/1	Video shows: input output functionality Written response includes: describes the overall purpose of the program. describes what functionality of the program is demonstrated in the video. describes the input and output of the program demonstrated in the video.	all criteria are met
2	1/1	written response includes two program code segments: one that shows how data has been stored in this list (or other collection type). one that shows the data in this same list being used as part of fulfilling the program’s purpose. written response also includes: identifies the name of the variable representing the list being used in this response. describes what the data contained in this list is representing in the program.	all criteria are met
3	1/1	written response includes: includes a program code segment that shows a list being used to manage complexity in the program. explains how the named, selected list manages complexity in the program code by explaining why the program code could not be written, or how it would be written differently, without using this list.	all criteria are met
4	1/1	written response includes two program code segments: one showing a student-developed procedure with at least one parameter that has an effect on the functionality of the procedure. one showing where the student-developed procedure is being called. written response also includes: describes what the identified procedure does and how it contributes to the overall functionality of the program.	all criteria are met
5	1/1	written response includes an algorithm with: sequencing iteration selection written response also includes: explains in detailed steps how the identified algorithm works in enough detail that someone else could recreate it.	all criteria are met
6	1/1	written response includes describes two calls to the selected procedure identified in written response 3c. Each call must pass a different argument(s) that causes a different segment of code in the algorithm to execute. describes the condition(s) being tested by each call to the procedure. identifies the result of each call.	all criteria are met
Overall: 6/6
Actual: 6/6

</table>

Performance Task #3

Row #	Score	Explanation	Comments
1	1/1	Video shows: input output functionality Written response includes: describes the overall purpose of the program. describes what functionality of the program is demonstrated in the video. describes the input and output of the program demonstrated in the video.	all criteria are met
2	1/1	written response includes two program code segments: one that shows how data has been stored in this list (or other collection type). one that shows the data in this same list being used as part of fulfilling the program’s purpose. written response also includes: identifies the name of the variable representing the list being used in this response. describes what the data contained in this list is representing in the program.
3	0/1	written response includes: includes a program code segment that shows a list being used to manage complexity in the program. explains how the named, selected list manages complexity in the program code by explaining why the program code could not be written, or how it would be written differently, without using this list.	Does not explain how the code would be written differently
4	0/1	written response includes two program code segments: one showing a student-developed procedure with at least one parameter that has an effect on the functionality of the procedure. one showing where the student-developed procedure is being called. written response also includes: describes what the identified procedure does and how it contributes to the overall functionality of the program.	Procedure has no parameter(s). I missed that the procedure is described inaccurately in saying that it changes the screen which it does not.
5	0/1	written response includes an algorithm with: sequencing iteration selection written response also includes: explains in detailed steps how the identified algorithm works in enough detail that someone else could recreate it.	Lacks iteration. I missed that the explanation did not include how states are selected with index values.
6	0/1	written response includes describes two calls to the selected procedure identified in written response 3c. Each call must pass a different argument(s) that causes a different segment of code in the algorithm to execute. describes the condition(s) being tested by each call to the procedure. identifies the result of each call.	None of the criteria are met.
Overall: 2/6
Actual: 1/6

Performance Task #4

Row #	Score	Explanation	Comments
1	1/1	Video shows: input output functionality Written response includes: describes the overall purpose of the program. describes what functionality of the program is demonstrated in the video. describes the input and output of the program demonstrated in the video.	all criteria are met
2	1/1	written response includes two program code segments: one that shows how data has been stored in this list (or other collection type). one that shows the data in this same list being used as part of fulfilling the program’s purpose. written response also includes: identifies the name of the variable representing the list being used in this response. describes what the data contained in this list is representing in the program.	all criteria are met
3	1/1	written response includes: includes a program code segment that shows a list being used to manage complexity in the program. explains how the named, selected list manages complexity in the program code by explaining why the program code could not be written, or how it would be written differently, without using this list.	all criteria are met
4	1/1	written response includes two program code segments: one showing a student-developed procedure with at least one parameter that has an effect on the functionality of the procedure. one showing where the student-developed procedure is being called. written response also includes: describes what the identified procedure does and how it contributes to the overall functionality of the program.	all criteria are met
5	1/1	written response includes an algorithm with: sequencing iteration selection written response also includes: explains in detailed steps how the identified algorithm works in enough detail that someone else could recreate it.	all criteria are met
6	1/1	written response includes describes two calls to the selected procedure identified in written response 3c. Each call must pass a different argument(s) that causes a different segment of code in the algorithm to execute. describes the condition(s) being tested by each call to the procedure. identifies the result of each call.	all criteria are met (NOT) i missed that NONE of the criteria are met.
Overall: 6/6
Actual: 5/6

Reflection:

I’ve noticed that it’s a lot easier to be accurate in grading for projects that meet all the requirements. I never give less points than the actual because I only miss when small things aren’t there as opposed to missing when they are there.